Project evidence through August 28, 2026

Rebuilding an implant-content cluster and tracking a dental practice's search visibility.

Dr Arnaud Vali runs a dental practice in Neuilly-sur-Seine, France. Forge's work included a technical SEO diagnosis and a 27-page implant-content rebuild on July 15 and 16, 2026. This case separates that delivery from the search visibility and advertising contacts recorded in the client report.

Client
Dr Arnaud Vali, dentiste-neuilly.fr
Specialty and location
Dentistry and implantology, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
Service
Technical SEO + content cluster + local SEO + Ads
Period
Delivery in July; observations through August 28, 2026
Discuss your practice's search visibilityFigures below identify the source, dates and unit. Search visibility and advertising contacts do not measure attended appointments or revenue.
173
Google Search clicks from June 22 to August 25, 2026. The period begins before the July rebuild.
Search Console, report dated August 28
27
Pages in the implant-content rebuild completed on July 15 and 16, 2026
Client delivery report, July 2026
15 to 27
Pages receiving impressions: 15 in June and 27 in August through August 25. Different-length periods.
Search Console monthly observations
#4 to #1
Position at the practice address for "dentiste": #4 on June 19, #1 on July 13 and August 28
Dated local ranking scans, 2026
The context

Content delivery and visibility needed separate checks

The project combined a technical diagnosis with work on the implant-content cluster. The delivery record confirms a 27-page rebuild. That count describes the work completed, not the number of pages indexed or patients acquired.

The client report also tracks pages receiving Google Search impressions. A page appearing in that report has received an impression; this is a different measure from a complete index-coverage audit.

The measurement problem

The reporting window starts before the rebuild

Search Console recorded 173 clicks and 14,029 impressions from June 22 to August 25, 2026. The rebuild shipped on July 15 and 16, so these totals cannot be described as results from the six weeks after the fix.

The report compares those totals with 72 clicks and 5,910 impressions in a previous period described as two months. Its exact date boundaries are not established here, so this case does not publish a normalized growth multiple.

What these observations can establish

Delivery: the July report documents a 27-page implant-content rebuild.

Visibility: Search Console and local ranking scans describe what was observed during their stated windows.

Attribution: these observations do not isolate the rebuild from other changes, or establish a patient or revenue increase.

The approach

Four parts of the project and its measurement

01

Diagnose the technical issues

A technical SEO diagnosis preceded the implant-content rebuild. This case reports the documented delivery and subsequent observations without claiming that one diagnosis explains every indexing decision.

02

Rebuild the implant-content cluster

The delivery record confirms 27 pages rebuilt on July 15 and 16, 2026. This is a count of pages in the project, not 27 additional indexed pages.

03

Track page visibility

Search Console recorded impressions for 15 pages in June, 24 in July and 27 in August through August 25. The final month is incomplete, and the count is not a daily growth rate.

04

Compare local observations carefully

Local scans record the query, date and measurement point. A position at the practice address is not a city-wide ranking, and a stable review count does not isolate SEO as the cause of a change.

Recorded observations

What the report shows, with dates and limits

Source: the July and August client report, dated August 28, 2026, using Search Console, local grid scans and Google Ads. The figures below separate reporting windows and measurement types.

MetricValue or earlier observationPeriod or later observationInterpretation
Clicks (GSC)173 clicksJune 22 to August 25, 2026Period begins before the rebuild
Impressions (GSC)14,029 impressionsJune 22 to August 25, 2026Search appearances, not visits
Implant-content rebuild27 pagesJuly 15 and 16, 2026Delivery count
Pages receiving impressions15 in June 202627 in August through August 25Different-length periods
Map rank at the address, "dentiste"#4 on June 19, 2026#1 on July 13 and August 28, 2026One location on the grid
Grid points in top 20, "cabinet dentaire"1 of 25 on June 19, 202612 of 25 on August 28, 2026Same query and grid; no causal claim
Clicks (GSC)

Value or earlier observation: 173 clicks

Period or later observation: June 22 to August 25, 2026

Interpretation: Period begins before the rebuild

Impressions (GSC)

Value or earlier observation: 14,029 impressions

Period or later observation: June 22 to August 25, 2026

Interpretation: Search appearances, not visits

Implant-content rebuild

Value or earlier observation: 27 pages

Period or later observation: July 15 and 16, 2026

Interpretation: Delivery count

Pages receiving impressions

Value or earlier observation: 15 in June 2026

Period or later observation: 27 in August through August 25

Interpretation: Different-length periods

Map rank at the address, "dentiste"

Value or earlier observation: #4 on June 19, 2026

Period or later observation: #1 on July 13 and August 28, 2026

Interpretation: One location on the grid

Grid points in top 20, "cabinet dentaire"

Value or earlier observation: 1 of 25 on June 19, 2026

Period or later observation: 12 of 25 on August 28, 2026

Interpretation: Same query and grid; no causal claim

The reporting window and the rebuild dates do not isolate the effect of the work. This case uses the dated absolute totals in the table above.
Month, 2026Pages receiving Google Search impressions
June15
July24
August (through August 25)27
June 2026

Pages receiving Google Search impressions: 15

July 2026

Pages receiving Google Search impressions: 24

August 2026 (through August 25)

Pages receiving Google Search impressions: 27

Source: Search Console. This is not an indexed-page count, and the August figure covers an incomplete month.

Local ranking observations

The "cabinet dentaire" grid on June 19 and August 28, 2026

For "cabinet dentaire", the archived grids show 1 of 25 points in the top 20 on June 19 and 12 of 25 on August 28. The August count has been corrected from the report after checking all 25 displayed positions. This observation applies to that query and grid, not every search in the city.

June 19, 2026
Local ranking grid for cabinet dentaire on June 19, 2026: 1 of 25 points in the top 20
June 19, 2026: 1 of 25 grid points in the top 20 for this query.
August 28, 2026
Local ranking grid for cabinet dentaire on August 28, 2026: 12 of 25 points in the top 20
August 28, 2026: 12 of 25 points in the top 20; position #2 at the practice address for this query.

What cannot be attributed from these scans

The report notes no additional reviews during the observed window. That does not control for all other ranking factors. The scans show changes in visibility; they do not prove that the technical and content work alone caused them.

The paid side

Advertising contacts are a separate measure

The report records EUR 609 in Google Ads spend and 14 identified contacts for the advertising period ending August 10, 2026. It separately records 16 calls, of which 12 were answered. These are contact and call counts, not attended appointments, treatments or revenue.

Evidence and limits

Assess the work and each measure separately

Dated source

The figures in this case are drawn from the client report and its archived Search Console, advertising and local ranking evidence. Access to client data depends on the client's permission.

Period boundaries matter

The click and impression totals begin on June 22, before the July rebuild. Exact dates for the earlier comparison period must be recovered before using it to calculate a comparable growth rate.

A local French project

This work concerns a dental practice in Neuilly-sur-Seine, France. Its observed search positions and contacts are not evidence of results in another city or country.

Questions practitioners ask

About this case

What work was completed?

The project record documents a technical SEO diagnosis and a 27-page implant-content rebuild completed on July 15 and 16, 2026.

Did clicks grow 2.4 times in the six weeks after the rebuild?

That is not established by the reporting window. The 173 clicks cover June 22 to August 25, beginning before the rebuild. The earlier total is 72 clicks, but its exact date boundaries have not been established here.

What did the local scans show?

For "dentiste", the practice was #4 at its address on June 19 and #1 on July 13 and August 28, 2026. For "cabinet dentaire", the archived grids show 1 of 25 top-20 points on June 19 and 12 of 25 on August 28. These are query-specific observations, not a guarantee of city-wide visibility.

What would transfer to another practice?

The approach is to diagnose the site's issues, define the work and track comparable measures over time. The priorities and outcomes depend on the practice, its market and its starting point.

Explore Forge's dental SEO services or discuss the scope of your own project in a free initial diagnostic.

Evidence reviewed September 13, 2026. Project observations run through August 28, 2026. Search visibility, advertising contacts and revenue are different measures.
Free diagnostic

See what applies to your practice

Tell us your specialty, your market and the services you want to grow. We review your website and current search visibility, then agree the scope and measurement plan before work starts.

Request your free diagnostic